Dec 10th was the day I passed the Committee review for SETC Senior. It took almost a month since I submitted my PSE, almost a year since I focused on writing my PSE and almost 3 years since I started my PSE, exactly 5 years from my last promotion. From December last year, I spared at least 30 minutes every morning to work on my SETC: reading guidelines, writing PSE, completing PATH self assessment and other tasks whatever contribute to my nomination.Seeing my PSE longer and longer each day was my motivation during this time.
Summary of my process:
April 2020, my PSE was 80% completed: still missing 2 or 3 examples and I’m in process of writing each example completely, I engaged with my direct manager about my SETC plan. My manager shared with me his PSE many years ago and encouraged me to continue.
Since then, my manager and I just talked about once a month to update my progress, I was still spending at least 30 minutes every day for SETC.
Jul 27, I completed my PATH assessment and sent to my manager for verification. It took me about 2 months to complete and almost 2 weeks for my manager to check and verify.
Since Aug, we had 2 or 3 calls to review my PSE, I adjusted my PSE according to my manager’s advice.
Oct 14th, my manager decided “Let’s have it a go” so I started to submit my PSE into SETC system right away, with a hope to complete it before year end. If I my nomination is stuck to next year, I’ll have problem because some important examples were from 2015, and next year they will be expired.
Since then, my manager and I follow up to get green light from N+2 manager, chasing the Reference letters to be completed ASAP. I lost valuable reference from a Managing Director because he can’t log in to SETC system.
Technical review – where the pain started
Nov 3rd, after collected 2 reference letters, my PSE were sent to 2 technical reviewers. The reviewer 2 gave me a pass quite quickly, just the day after. The reviewer 1 worked on it very carefully, for a week, and then held me back and said I need to rework on Solution Experience and Input to Business Strategy pillars, my writing in those pillars didn’t satisfy him/her. After knowing that, I rewrote the PSE according to his comments, and submitted again on Nov 11th.
Nov 13th, the reviewer 1 held me back again with more detailed comments in those 2 pillars and asked me to find a SETC mentor to help rewriting. Additionally, HR manager said I had 1 last shot to take. My feeling was bad after being “rejected” 2 times by this reviewer. I didn’t know who he/she was but I wished I could talk to him/her to protect my points. But that was the game! I disappointed, closed everything and didn’t touch SETC for 3 days. On day four, I decided I had to move on, the year was ending and I would be in worse trouble if I couldn’t make it this year, so I tried to find a PTE champion in Thailand to help me rewrite it. It’s lucky that I had a good relationship with TH colleagues so he supported me very well. I called him, sent him my PSE, he reviewed and sent back with comments, the process repeated 3 times in 1 week before we came to the final version and I submitted again on Nov 25th. The PTE champion and I worked days and nights for this version.
The reviewer was on vacation so I had to wait until Dec 7th to see it’s updated, he/she gave me a pass. On Dec 10th, the committee review was conducted. The commitee review had other SETC Principals together with GeoUnit Managers to walk through my PSE, challenge my manager about my technical contributions, without my presence. It’s completed the day just 1 day before when my manager took vacation for the rest 2 weeks of the year, so I can call it, in last minute. Just 1 day later, it could take me some more years to complete.
I was proud to read the Committee Review Feedbacks:
Good PSE from IT function, well prepared though sometimes exceeding the required number of examples. Wide knowledge and exposure, not soloed into specific sub-domain. Good examples on supporting other functions and various campaigns.
That was a challenging process, sometimes I thought I would stop but finally, I made it. From a technical view, I think this challgenging process made the recognition fair, transparent and worth to experience.